Showing posts with label google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label google. Show all posts

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Chinese Government Censoring as Many Positive As Negative Comments Online

It won't come as a great shock to long term China watchers that The Great Firewall is an annoying waste of time and money.  The Chinese government considers controlling the Internet inside it's boundaries as a top priority and a major threat to its existence, as well as threat to the many web companies that pay good money to have western rivals blocked.

What might be surprising is new research that suggests the government is much more canny that we may have previously given them credit for.  Lessons from the Arab Spring have taught the CCP that allowing criticism is ok, but posts that provide calls to action, which may even support the Chinese government are deleted.

The report, published yesterday by a group of Harvard students, also notes what some of us have known all along.  Government rules are passed to individual ISPs and social networking sites, but it's up to the different companies to interpret the rules.  Thus, not all censorship is born equal.  The resultant effect is that that a "fuzzy line" is drawn, creating a panopticon, where it's not always possible to predict what will be censored and what won't.

Automatic review of posts made to social networks is an inelegant system badly implemented.  At first glance, it looks like a good idea, but anyone who manages a website will know how quickly problems created by a bad word list can escalate into major catastrophes.

Search records from Google's time in China show that because of the Chinese affection for naming people using common nouns, it was possible for the character meaning "jiang" returned no results, at a time when rumors began swirling online about Jiang Zemin's declining helath, "jiang" made it to the bad word list.  Unfortunately, since the same Chinese character can also mean "river", search relating to, say, the Yangtze Rive would also return no results.

Ultimately, people learn not to discuss even fringe topics concerning government policy, and stick to posting pictures amusing pictures of cats instead.  The policy of publish first and review second will be familiar to those use regularly use Chinese social networking.  Commonly known as being hairy crabbed, a nod to Hu Jin Tao's eupahism of "harmonizing" social media posts.  The benefit of this system is that it allows people outside the sphere of Chinese influence to use API's published by web companies in order to present a "free" version of a censored social network.

For a revolution that was fought the in the name of the masses, the Chinese government seems to be hellbent on empowering the individual.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Moto X Costs $4 More to Be Made in the US

Google won praise for moving it's manufacturing plant from China to Texas, but there won't be a Made in America revolution anytime soon.

The extra cost of making the Moto X is a mere $4, but there are other reasons why tech companies won't be in a hurry to move their production bases from Asia back to the US.  The first thing to remember is that the costs of production that have been bandied about on the Intertubes are just estimates, Google hasn't officially commented on the costs (yet).

According to industry experts, the Moto X cost $12 per phone to make the phone in America, whereas it costs Apple $8 per phone to make their iPhones in China, and 50 cents more for Samsung to have it's Galaxy S assembled China-side too.  While a difference of four measly dollars might not look that much, per unit, it adds up to a hell of a difference - $550 million worth of a difference if you believe unofficial figures.

It's true that Apple is shifting it's production of the Macbook to the US, but the Macbook represents a minor product line compared with sales of iPads and iPhones.

The way that Chinese companies house their workers on-site in dorms improves effeciency, especially when last minute design changes are made.  Larger pools of labour and technicians are available in China compared to the US - Apple has 300,000 technical staff supporting it's assembly line workers at their plant in China.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 26, 2013

Could Apple Succeed Where Google Failed?

Doing business in China isn't exactly easy.  With the protectionism, lack of any kind of copyright law adherence, and rabid, disgruntled Weibo users who take to the Interwebs every time a warranty isn't honored, you'd think that international brands would steer clear of trying to sell anything to anybody in China.

Since Google's unceremonious exit from the country in 2010, western brands have been having one hell of a tough time.  The Chinese government would rather see Chinese brands being sold to the Chinese, mostly because it bolsters their image of driving the economy to greater and greater heights, and not many of the people who control the real money have enough foreign business experience to make deals with the tech giants of Silicon Valley.

Apple has been having a hard time of late, with a laughable attack from the National Consumer Day Gala, and a number of anti-Apple editorials in state-media, USA Today examines if the  grovelling apology from CEO TIm Cook will be  just enough to shore up Apples sales for the foreseeable future.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Made in the USA: Why Tech Companies Are Looking West

Once upon a time, China was known for being the factory of the world, producing goods that it's own people couldn't afford to buy.  The economies of outsourcing to China were pretty obvious, lower wages and a large population looking to earn a low wage meant that production lines could be manned with substantial savings, especially for tech companies.

Apple, and Motorola (Google providing the OS for their phones) are all moving their production back to America for selected products, however.  The Moto X, MacBook Pro and Thinkpad are all proudly boasting that they are now made in the USA.

Besides the fact that customers in the US prefer to buy things that are made in the US, and that Chinese made products tend to have things in them that poison people, shipping time constraints and rising wages (Chinese wages have increased 71% since 2008) are also being blamed for the new "look west" attitude of industry giants.  The cost of assembling in China and shipping to the US will be the same as manufacturing the product entirely in the US by 2015.  Media reports, no matter how untrue, criticizing the working conditions of those who work on the Apple production don't do much to sell iPod, either.

Apple had tried to make it's products a little more appealing to patriotic Americans by famously adding the "Designed by Apple in California" tag to it's products, but the Made in America, as the Japanese auto industry proved, might not be enough to shore up sales.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Google Whacked

There’s a myth that China needs saving from evil dictators, or that Chinese people need to be somehow civilized.  That’s simply not true.  The truth is that there’s little in the way of mass oppression as there once was, and most of the so-called political maneuvers are more than likely to be economically motivated than political – so much so that that when the Chinese government blocked the movie portal IMDB in China, I instantly commented that there must be a Chinese–backed version of the site to open in mainland China soon.

I don’t think that western countries have the best way of doing things, (in much the same way that I don’t think the Chinese way is the best way) as anyone who has been through an election year in the UK can testify.  No, it’s just that when I see a good idea rejected for no good reason, I don’t really see any reason to waste time, energy and money on getting the idea accepted.  I don’t think, for example that IMDB should be blocked in mainland China, I don’t think that “because of the Korean War” is a good excuse to give to me when I ask why can’t I exchange Won in Beijing and I don’t think that the answer to winter heating is to sling another block of coal on the Aga.

All of these things and more hurt China and Chinese people, and they hurt China in the worst possible way, they are rules enforced for the good of the minority that will benefit only in the short term.  The foreigners sure as hell aren’t going to hang around if Beijing air starts to melt their fillings, but thanks to the shortsighted government policies, Chinese people have little choice but settle back in with a bottle of Tsigntao to watch The Happy Show while their face melts.  Sure, the laowai are going to uproot their families and they may never eat gong bao chicken ever again, but then again, who wants to drink milk that could land you in the emergency room?

The one reason why I like the Internet is that it’s a major pain in the ass for the Chinese government.  The Internet is a problem, not only because it allows the free flow of ideas, but because it allows people to easily compare their living standards.  At one time in China it was easy to tell people that they were doing good work and that they were beating the evil Americans when it comes to wheat production.  Nowadays, it’s not so easy.  The Internet is open and accessible to everyone.  Peer review has never been so easy - anyone can look at it, and anyone can poke holes in it, sniff it, lick and get up close and personal to it.  The only problem is that the Chinese are not really used to people being able to look at it and poke holes in it.  Only last week a large fraud was discovered by an obscure science journal in papers that were authored by Chinese scientists.  Acta Crystollographica Section E found that all that Chinese researchers had done was to alter certain, existing crystal structures by one or two atoms with the intention of making the structure seem entirely new.  The discovery led to the withdrawal of the papers by the two groups that submitted them in the first place – a total of 70 between them.

The big money in China these days is to be made in the online sector – after all, it’s the largest in the world.  The problem is, there isn’t one large Chinese dotcom that isn’t a copy of an existing western site - Facebook has Kaixin, Flickr has Yupoo, Google has Baidu and Youtube has Youku.  The sad truth is that the Chinese can’t do much on their own.  They can’t even make a good movie with a panda in it.  Nowhere is this more evident than in the Chinese cyberspace.  Chinese companies take and existing western idea, add various China-centric bells and whistles to it (for example, Kaixin has a hugely popular car-park based game that would only be successful in China) and then market it with the usual censorship and the all important Chinese character set.  Even the censorship software that was produced at the government’s behest used a blacklist and source code that was pirated from an American company.  It’s a game that been well played in the US movie industry – we suffer endless remakes of Mission:Impossible, Spiderman, The Incredible Hulk, ad nauseum – good ideas that worked in the past are much safer to invest in.

American companies have taken a lot of heat for even setting foot in China.  Yahoo!, Cisco and Google have all been hauled up in front of the US senate to explain just what the hell they’re up to in China.  Getting into bed with the commies still rattles some cages up on Capitol Hill.  Cisco has been suspiciously quiet about supplying hardware and software that runs the Great Firewall, Yahoo! handed over emails that got a human rights activist thrown in the slammer, and as for Google.  Well.

Google made a convincing argument when they started running Google.cn.  They pointed out that a limited search engine is much better than no search engine at all.  For a long time, they had me convinced.  They spouted at length the need to comply with local laws, as did Yahoo!  But that was before they felt the sharp end of Chinese business practices.  But that’s all changed for the time being.  For the time being, it’s Google vs. China.

It’s not the first time that big business has gone head-to-head with the Chinese government.  Green Dam/Youth Escort (remember that?) was effectively retired after a number of Chinese companies complained that the deadlines imposed by the Chinese government were impossible to abide by, and that the software itself was buggy beyond belief.  It was the first time that business had won out over the mandate of the Chinese government.  Now it looks like Google is trying to do the same thing.

There’s a lot riding on this.  Apart from the thousands of people that are employed at Google China - and it’s a good bet that a number of fine upstanding party members have sons and daughters working there – a growing number of businesses and individuals have become increasingly reliant on Google technology.  The grievances that Google has are pretty serious, it’s been well known that Chinese hackers have not been shy in recent years, to the point that they’re now posing a serious threat to the US.  The problem is that that Google has discovered that at least 20 other countries that have had major security breaches inflicted upon them that originated in the Chinese mainland.  While these companies haven’t yet been named, what should concern the Chinese is if Google has enough clout to convince the others that operating within Chinese law and getting your hand bitten for your trouble simply isn't worth it.

UPDATES

Since the above was put together while I was waiting to make phone calls to some of the good folk of Beijing, much has beeen written in the last 8 hours, so here is a short collection of links that didn't exist at the time of writing.

Imagethief
James Fallows (The Atlantic)
Global Voices Online
The Peking Duck
Shanghaiist
China Hearsay

Chinese Answers

On the outside, China's answer to Silicon Valley doesn't look the part: It's a crowded mass of electronics malls, fast-food join...